
I can’t hold a book while I mop or commute. Still, that’s no reason for print devotees to sniff. Indeed, research shows that adults get nearly identical scores on a reading test if they listen to the passages instead of reading them. We use the mental mechanism that evolved to understand oral language to support the comprehension of written language. Writing is less than 6,000 years old, insufficient time for the evolution of specialized mental processes devoted to reading. Once you’ve identified the words (whether by listening or reading), the same mental process comprehends the sentences and paragraphs they form.

Although decoding is serious work for beginning readers, it’s automatic by high school, and no more effortful or error prone than listening. Consider why audiobooks are a good workaround for people with dyslexia: They allow listeners to get the meaning while skirting the work of decoding, that is, the translation of print on the page to words in the mind. But examining how we read and how we listen shows that each is best suited to different purposes, and neither is superior. These trends might lead us to fear that audiobooks will do to reading what keyboarding has done to handwriting - rendered it a skill that seems quaint and whose value is open to debate. But today the question I get most often is, “Is it cheating if I listen to an audiobook for my book club?”Īudiobook sales have doubled in the last five years while print and e-book sales are flat. Willingham, a psychologist, compares the benefits of reading a book with the advantages of listening to one:Ī few years ago, when people heard I was a reading researcher, they might ask about their child’s dyslexia or how to get their teenager to read more.

In the Opinion essay “ Is Listening to a Book the Same Thing as Reading It,?” Daniel T. Do you listen to audiobooks? How is the experience different than reading a book? Do you have a preference? In your opinion, is one experience better?
